Ass Savers Fendor Bendor vs SKS S-Board
Comparison 2026 — Fenders
VS
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Ass Savers Fendor Bendor edges out the SKS S-Board with an overall score of 80/100 against 75/100. It scores particularly well on coverage (72/100) and ease of mounting (94/100), making it the better all-round pick in Fenders.
The SKS S-Board remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €15.00 versus €20.00.
Coverage winner
Ass Savers Fendor Bendor
10% higher than its rival
Value winner
SKS S-Board
2% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | Ass Savers Fendor Bendor | SKS S-Board |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €20.00 | €15.00+33% |
| Rating | ★4.4 (950) | ★4.2 (1,680) |
| Overall | 80/100+7% | 75/100 |
| Dimensions | ||
| Wheel size | 700c / 28"+2592% | 26-28" / 700c |
| Width | 68 mm+13% | 60 mm |
| Weight | 45 g+111% | 95 g |
| Folded size | Broekzakformaat | — |
| Material | — | Kunststof |
| Fitment | ||
| Seat tube | Universeel incl. aero | — |
| Tyre clearance | Tot 32 mm | Tot 35 mm+9% |
| Mounting | Rubberen banden, gereedschapsloos | Clip-on zadelpen, geen gereedschap |
| Seatpost diameter | — | 25-34 mm |
Pros and cons
Ass Savers Fendor Bendor
Pros
- Folds to pocket size — carry it in your jersey back pocket
- Fits any seat tube including aero profiles where the S-Board fails
- Surprisingly good coverage for the low weight (45 g)
- Scandinavian design available in multiple colours and patterns
Cons
- Rubber mounting straps wear out after a few seasons of use
- Offers less rigid coverage than plastic alternatives
SKS S-Board
Pros
- Installs in 10 seconds with no tools — just clip on the seatpost
- Fits virtually any seatpost from 25-34 mm diameter
- Light (95 g) and removable for dry rides
- Affordable emergency option for unexpected Randstad rain showers
Cons
- Only protects your back — trouser legs and shoes still get soaked
- On bumpy cycle paths the board can slowly slip down over time