Fietsvergelijk

ENGWE Engine Pro 2.0 vs Shengmilo S600

Comparison 2026Fat Bikes

80

ENGWE Engine Pro 2.0

ENGWE · Vouwbare fatbike

1299.00

VS
74

Shengmilo S600

Shengmilo · Mountain fatbike

1399.00

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the ENGWE Engine Pro 2.0 edges out the Shengmilo S600 with an overall score of 80/100 against 74/100. It scores particularly well on motor performance (76/100) and terrain grip (82/100), making it the better all-round pick in Fat Bikes.

The Shengmilo S600 remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €1399.00 versus €1299.00.

Motor performance winner

ENGWE Engine Pro 2.0

2% higher than its rival

Value winner

ENGWE Engine Pro 2.0

12% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationENGWE Engine Pro 2.0Shengmilo S600
Price€1299.00+8%€1399.00
Rating★4.4 (860)★4.2 (520)
Overall80/100+8%74/100
Drivetrain
Motor250W achternaaf / 250W rear hub250W achternaaf / 250W rear hub
Top speed25 km/h (EU-legaal / EU-legal)25 km/h (EU-legaal / EU-legal)
Battery48V 16Ah (768 Wh)48V 17.5Ah (840 Wh)
Range70-100 km70-95 km
GearingShimano 7-speedShimano 9-speed+29%
Frame & tires
Weight33 kg32 kg+3%
Wheel size20 x 4.0 inch26 x 4.0 inch+30%
FrameAluminium, vouwbaar / Aluminum, foldingAluminium, niet-vouwbaar / Aluminum, non-folding
SuspensionVoor + achter / Front + rearVoor + achter / Front + rear
BrakesHydraulische schijfremmen / Hydraulic discHydraulische schijfremmen / Hydraulic disc

Pros and cons

ENGWE Engine Pro 2.0

Pros

  • 250W EU-legal pedal assistance up to 25 km/h without throttle keeps you within Dutch rules
  • 48V 16Ah (768 Wh) battery delivers 70-100 km range in Eco mode
  • Full suspension with front fork and rear shock soaks up tram rails and kerbs
  • Folding mechanism makes storage in a car boot or on a balcony possible

Cons

  • At 33 kg extremely heavy for a folding bike — apartment stairs are a serious workout
  • Rear hub motor without torque sensor feels on/off compared to Bosch mid-drives

Shengmilo S600

Pros

  • Full front and rear suspension suits serious trail riding
  • 48V 17.5Ah (840 Wh) battery returns 70-95 km in Eco
  • 26 inch wheels with 4.0 inch tyres roll more stably than 20 inch options
  • Hydraulic disc brakes front and rear stop reliably in muddy conditions

Cons

  • No folding mechanism — storage needs a regular bike shed or rack
  • Non-folding and 32 kg makes car or train transport cumbersome

Other comparisons