Fafrees F26 Carbon M vs Shengmilo S600
Comparison 2026 — Fat Bikes
VS
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Fafrees F26 Carbon M edges out the Shengmilo S600 with an overall score of 82/100 against 74/100. It scores particularly well on motor performance (86/100) and terrain grip (84/100), making it the better all-round pick in Fat Bikes.
The Shengmilo S600 remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €1399.00 versus €1499.00.
Motor performance winner
Fafrees F26 Carbon M
12% higher than its rival
Value winner
Fafrees F26 Carbon M
6% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | Fafrees F26 Carbon M | Shengmilo S600 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €1499.00 | €1399.00+7% |
| Rating | ★4.6 (640) | ★4.2 (520) |
| Overall | 82/100+11% | 74/100 |
| Drivetrain | ||
| Motor | Bafang 250W achternaaf + koppelsensor | 250W achternaaf / 250W rear hub |
| Top speed | 25 km/h (EU-legaal / EU-legal) | 25 km/h (EU-legaal / EU-legal) |
| Battery | 48V 18Ah (864 Wh) | 48V 17.5Ah (840 Wh) |
| Range | 80-110 km+14% | 70-95 km |
| Gearing | Shimano 8-speed | Shimano 9-speed+13% |
| Frame & tires | ||
| Weight | 24 kg+33% | 32 kg |
| Wheel size | 26 x 4.0 inch | 26 x 4.0 inch |
| Frame | Carbon, niet-vouwbaar / Carbon, non-folding | Aluminium, niet-vouwbaar / Aluminum, non-folding |
| Suspension | Voorvork / Front fork | Voor + achter / Front + rear |
| Brakes | Hydraulische schijfremmen / Hydraulic disc | Hydraulische schijfremmen / Hydraulic disc |
Pros and cons
Fafrees F26 Carbon M
Pros
- Bafang 250W rear hub motor with real torque sensor feels natural and progressive
- Carbon frame drops weight to 24 kg — by far the lightest fatbike here
- 48V 18Ah (864 Wh) battery delivers 80-110 km of range in Eco
- 26 inch wheels give better rolling resistance and stability than 20 inch alternatives
Cons
- Carbon parts are more vulnerable to crashes than aluminium
- No folding mechanism — balcony or boot storage is harder
Shengmilo S600
Pros
- Full front and rear suspension suits serious trail riding
- 48V 17.5Ah (840 Wh) battery returns 70-95 km in Eco
- 26 inch wheels with 4.0 inch tyres roll more stably than 20 inch options
- Hydraulic disc brakes front and rear stop reliably in muddy conditions
Cons
- No folding mechanism — storage needs a regular bike shed or rack
- Non-folding and 32 kg makes car or train transport cumbersome