SKS S-Board vs Ass Savers Fendor Bendor
Comparison 2026 — Fenders
VS
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Ass Savers Fendor Bendor edges out the SKS S-Board with an overall score of 80/100 against 75/100. It scores particularly well on coverage (72/100) and ease of mounting (94/100), making it the better all-round pick in Fenders.
The SKS S-Board remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €15.00 versus €20.00.
Coverage winner
Ass Savers Fendor Bendor
10% higher than its rival
Value winner
SKS S-Board
2% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | SKS S-Board | Ass Savers Fendor Bendor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €15.00+33% | €20.00 |
| Rating | ★4.2 (1,680) | ★4.4 (950) |
| Overall | 75/100 | 80/100+7% |
| Dimensions | ||
| Wheel size | 26-28" / 700c | 700c / 28"+2592% |
| Width | 60 mm | 68 mm+13% |
| Weight | 95 g | 45 g+111% |
| Material | Kunststof | — |
| Folded size | — | Broekzakformaat |
| Fitment | ||
| Seatpost diameter | 25-34 mm | — |
| Tyre clearance | Tot 35 mm+9% | Tot 32 mm |
| Mounting | Clip-on zadelpen, geen gereedschap | Rubberen banden, gereedschapsloos |
| Seat tube | — | Universeel incl. aero |
Pros and cons
SKS S-Board
Pros
- Installs in 10 seconds with no tools — just clip on the seatpost
- Fits virtually any seatpost from 25-34 mm diameter
- Light (95 g) and removable for dry rides
- Affordable emergency option for unexpected Randstad rain showers
Cons
- Only protects your back — trouser legs and shoes still get soaked
- On bumpy cycle paths the board can slowly slip down over time
Ass Savers Fendor Bendor
Pros
- Folds to pocket size — carry it in your jersey back pocket
- Fits any seat tube including aero profiles where the S-Board fails
- Surprisingly good coverage for the low weight (45 g)
- Scandinavian design available in multiple colours and patterns
Cons
- Rubber mounting straps wear out after a few seasons of use
- Offers less rigid coverage than plastic alternatives