Steco Transport Original Front vs Basil Cento WSL
Comparison 2026 — Bike Baskets
VS
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Basil Cento WSL edges out the Steco Transport Original Front with an overall score of 82/100 against 80/100. It scores particularly well on capacity (88/100) and ease of mounting (86/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Baskets.
The Steco Transport Original Front remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €40.00 versus €35.00.
Capacity winner
Steco Transport Original Front
4% higher than its rival
Specifications
| Specification | Steco Transport Original Front | Basil Cento WSL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €40.00 | €35.00+14% |
| Rating | ★4.5 (920) | ★4.4 (1,240) |
| Overall | 80/100 | 82/100+3% |
| Capacity | ||
| Volume | 30 L | 45 L+50% |
| Max load | 15 kg+25% | 12 kg |
| Material | Gepoedercoat staal | Gevlochten kunststof |
| Mounting | ||
| System | Steco balhoofdhouder | MIK |
| Position | Voorop balhoofd | Achterop |
| Weight | 3 kg | 1.2 kg+150% |
Pros and cons
Steco Transport Original Front
Pros
- 15 kg load capacity — a beer crate or full shopping bag is no problem
- Mounted directly to the head tube, not the handlebar
- Steco is a Dutch family firm with a 20+ year reputation
- Steers better than handlebar baskets thanks to lower mounting point
Cons
- Mounting requires a Steco bracket matched to your frame
- At 3 kg empty it's heavier than handlebar-mounted alternatives
Basil Cento WSL
Pros
- MIK system clicks onto nearly every Gazelle, Batavus or Cortina rack
- 45 litres — enough for a full weekly Albert Heijn run
- Wicker-look pairs visually with the classic Dutch omafiets
- Sturdy rim keeps bulging shopping bags in place
Cons
- Requires a MIK-compatible rack — not universal
- Wicker discolours after a few Dutch winters outside