Fietsvergelijk

Thule EasyFold XT 2 vs Thule ProRide 598

Comparison 2026Bike Racks

92

Thule EasyFold XT 2

Thule · Trekhaakdrager

550.00

VS
76

Thule ProRide 598

Thule · Dakdrager

130.00

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the Thule EasyFold XT 2 edges out the Thule ProRide 598 with an overall score of 92/100 against 76/100. It scores particularly well on stability (94/100) and e-bike suitability (96/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Racks.

The Thule ProRide 598 remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €130.00 versus €550.00.

Stability winner

Thule EasyFold XT 2

14% higher than its rival

Value winner

Thule ProRide 598

8% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationThule EasyFold XT 2Thule ProRide 598
Price€550.00€130.00+323%
Rating★4.7 (2,650)★4.5 (1,820)
Overall92/100+21%76/100
Capacity
Number of bikes2+100%1
Max weight per bike30 kg20 kg+50%
Max total load60 kg+200%20 kg
Rack weight18.2 kg4.5 kg+304%
E-bike suitableJa / YesNee / No
Mounting
MountingTrekhaak (kogel)Dak (T-gleuf of klem)
FoldableJa — volledig
TiltableJa
Loading rampMeegeleverd
Integrated lightsJa, 13-polig
Clamp typeFrameklem met momentknop
LockFrame + drager, één sleutel
Roof-bar compatibleThule, Yakima, T-slot

Pros and cons

Thule EasyFold XT 2

Pros

  • Fully folding — stands upright in most boots when not in use
  • Included ramp hoists 25 kg e-bikes onto the rack without straining your back
  • 60 kg total load over two bikes leaves margin for heavy speed pedelecs
  • AcuTight torque knob and fast tow-ball mounting in under a minute

Cons

  • At €550 significantly pricier than regular two-bike racks — you pay for the folding
  • Its 18.2 kg own weight is noticeable when lifting it out of the boot

Thule ProRide 598

Pros

  • Excellent value for carrying a single bike on the roof
  • Keeps the bike intact — no front-wheel removal required
  • Locks both frame and rack with a single key
  • Fits most Thule, Yakima and standard T-slot roof bars

Cons

  • Lifting a bike to roof height is physically demanding, especially on SUVs
  • Fuel consumption jumps notably due to drag on long drives

Other comparisons