Fietsvergelijk

Ortlieb Back-Roller Classic vs Basil City Shopper

Comparison 2026Bike Bags

94

Ortlieb Back-Roller Classic

Ortlieb · Achtertas

134.95

VS
68

Basil City Shopper

Basil · Boodschappentas

39.95

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the Ortlieb Back-Roller Classic edges out the Basil City Shopper with an overall score of 94/100 against 68/100. It scores particularly well on waterproofing (100/100) and capacity (90/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Bags.

The Basil City Shopper remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €39.95 versus €134.95.

Waterproofing winner

Ortlieb Back-Roller Classic

50% higher than its rival

Value winner

Basil City Shopper

14% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationOrtlieb Back-Roller ClassicBasil City Shopper
Price€134.95€39.95+238%
Rating★4.7 (4,200)★4.2 (1,680)
Overall94/100+38%68/100
Capacity
Volume20 L per tas (set van 2)+25%16 L
Load capacity9 kg per tas
Dimensions42 × 32 × 17 cm+20%35 × 31 × 15 cm
Material
Main materialPU-gecoat Cordura nylonPolyester dubbelwandig
WaterproofIP64, gelaste naden + rolsluitingNee (waterafstotend)
Weight930 g per tas500 g+86%
Mount
SystemQL2.1 Quick-LockHaken voor bagagedrager

Pros and cons

Ortlieb Back-Roller Classic

Pros

  • 100% waterproof thanks to welded seams and roll closure — proven over years of touring
  • QL2.1 mount: one-handed click-on and click-off, fits any rear rack
  • 20 litres per bag (set of 2 = 40 litres)
  • 5-year warranty, Made in Germany, repair service available

Cons

  • Premium price for a set of two bags
  • Roll closure is less convenient than a zip for grabbing things quickly

Basil City Shopper

Pros

  • Double-walled design keeps the bag open for easy loading
  • Budget price — the cheapest decent bike bag in this list
  • Universal hooks fit almost any rear rack
  • Reflective details for visibility in the dark

Cons

  • Not waterproof — you'll need a rain cover when it pours
  • Hooks are basic, nowhere near as solid as Ortlieb's QL2.1

Other comparisons