Fietsvergelijk

Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves vs GripGrab Windster 2 Handschoenen

Comparison 2026Cycling Clothing

78

Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves

Sealskinz · Winterhandschoenen

45.00

VS
80

GripGrab Windster 2 Handschoenen

GripGrab · Winterhandschoenen

35.00

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the GripGrab Windster 2 Handschoenen edges out the Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves with an overall score of 80/100 against 78/100. It scores particularly well on waterproofing (68/100) and breathability (82/100), making it the better all-round pick in Cycling Clothing.

The Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €45.00 versus €35.00.

Waterproofing winner

Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves

20% higher than its rival

Value winner

GripGrab Windster 2 Handschoenen

16% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationSealskinz Waterproof Cycling GlovesGripGrab Windster 2 Handschoenen
Price€45.00€35.00+29%
Rating★4.3 (2,140)★4.5 (1,860)
Overall78/10080/100+3%
Materials
Water column10.000 mm
Breathability8.000 g/m²/24h
OuterElastaan met DWR-coating
Weight110 g (per paar)85 g (per paar)+29%
Wind resistance100% winddicht front
Water repellencyDWR-coating
LiningBrushed fleece
Sizing
SizesS t/m XLXS t/m XXL
Temperature0-10°C0-10°C

Pros and cons

Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves

Pros

  • 10,000 mm water column — dry hands through hours of autumn rain
  • Silicone grip on palm and fingers for wet-bar control
  • Touchscreen-capable thumb and index finger
  • Rated for 0-10°C without a liner

Cons

  • Below freezing you still need a liner glove
  • Slow to dry — plan a backup pair for consecutive rainy days

GripGrab Windster 2 Handschoenen

Pros

  • Windproof front panel — no chill at 0-10°C
  • DWR coating sheds light rain and drizzle
  • Silicone grip on palm and fingers for bar control
  • Palm pad dampens road vibrations

Cons

  • Not waterproof in sustained rain — DWR gives up after 30 minutes
  • Too thin as sole layer below -2°C

Other comparisons