Fietsvergelijk

Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves vs Shimano S-Phyre Overschoenen

Comparison 2026Cycling Clothing

78

Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves

Sealskinz · Winterhandschoenen

45.00

VS
77

Shimano S-Phyre Overschoenen

Shimano · Overschoenen

55.00

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves edges out the Shimano S-Phyre Overschoenen with an overall score of 78/100 against 77/100. It scores particularly well on waterproofing (88/100) and breathability (72/100), making it the better all-round pick in Cycling Clothing.

The Shimano S-Phyre Overschoenen remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €55.00 versus €45.00.

Waterproofing winner

Shimano S-Phyre Overschoenen

4% higher than its rival

Value winner

Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves

6% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationSealskinz Waterproof Cycling GlovesShimano S-Phyre Overschoenen
Price€45.00+22%€55.00
Rating★4.3 (2,140)★4.4 (920)
Overall78/100+1%77/100
Materials
Water column10.000 mm15.000 mm+50%
Breathability8.000 g/m²/24h+14%7.000 g/m²/24h
OuterElastaan met DWR-coating
Weight110 g (per paar)+27%140 g (per paar)
SeamsVolledig getapet
Sizing
SizesS t/m XLS (36-40) t/m XXL (47-49)
Temperature0-10°C
Shoe typeRoad/Gravel clipless

Pros and cons

Sealskinz Waterproof Cycling Gloves

Pros

  • 10,000 mm water column — dry hands through hours of autumn rain
  • Silicone grip on palm and fingers for wet-bar control
  • Touchscreen-capable thumb and index finger
  • Rated for 0-10°C without a liner

Cons

  • Below freezing you still need a liner glove
  • Slow to dry — plan a backup pair for consecutive rainy days

Shimano S-Phyre Overschoenen

Pros

  • 15,000 mm water column — rated for extreme autumn conditions
  • Fully taped seams — no leaks in sustained rain
  • Aerodynamic fit for road and gravel shoes
  • Rear reflective accents for traffic visibility

Cons

  • Only fits clipless road and gravel shoes, not city shoes
  • Rear zipper wears faster than the fabric itself

Other comparisons