Fietsvergelijk

SKS Bluemels vs Ass Savers Fendor Bendor

Comparison 2026Fenders

87

SKS Bluemels

SKS · Volledig spatbord

35.00

VS
80

Ass Savers Fendor Bendor

Ass Savers · Clip-on achter

20.00

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the SKS Bluemels edges out the Ass Savers Fendor Bendor with an overall score of 87/100 against 80/100. It scores particularly well on coverage (90/100) and ease of mounting (78/100), making it the better all-round pick in Fenders.

The Ass Savers Fendor Bendor remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €20.00 versus €35.00.

Coverage winner

SKS Bluemels

18% higher than its rival

Value winner

Ass Savers Fendor Bendor

6% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationSKS BluemelsAss Savers Fendor Bendor
Price€35.00€20.00+75%
Rating★4.5 (2,150)★4.4 (950)
Overall87/100+9%80/100
Dimensions
Wheel size28" (700c)700c / 28"+2400%
Width45-53 mm68 mm+51%
Weight (set)650 g
MaterialAluminium-versterkt kunststof
Weight45 g
Folded sizeBroekzakformaat
Fitment
Tyre clearanceTot 42 mm+31%Tot 32 mm
MountingFrame-eyelets + Secu-ClipRubberen banden, gereedschapsloos
Bike typeTrekking / stad / e-bike
Seat tubeUniverseel incl. aero

Pros and cons

SKS Bluemels

Pros

  • Full coverage — front and rear wheels stay dry on typical Dutch rainy days
  • Secu-Clip safety mount releases if something jams the wheel, preventing endos
  • Aluminium-reinforced body is stiffer than pure plastic budget rivals
  • Fits tyres up to 42 mm wide — works on trekking bikes and most e-bikes

Cons

  • Installation needs frame eyelets or an adapter — not every road bike fits
  • Mud flaps are on the short side; riders behind you still get sprayed

Ass Savers Fendor Bendor

Pros

  • Folds to pocket size — carry it in your jersey back pocket
  • Fits any seat tube including aero profiles where the S-Board fails
  • Surprisingly good coverage for the low weight (45 g)
  • Scandinavian design available in multiple colours and patterns

Cons

  • Rubber mounting straps wear out after a few seasons of use
  • Offers less rigid coverage than plastic alternatives

Other comparisons