100% Speedcraft vs POC Aspire
Comparison 2026 — Cycling Glasses
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the POC Aspire edges out the 100% Speedcraft with an overall score of 82/100 against 80/100. It scores particularly well on protection (88/100) and comfort (90/100), making it the better all-round pick in Cycling Glasses.
The 100% Speedcraft remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €130.00 versus €120.00.
Protection winner
POC Aspire
2% higher than its rival
Value winner
100% Speedcraft
4% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | 100% Speedcraft | POC Aspire |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €130.00 | €120.00+8% |
| Rating | ★4.5 (1,700) | ★4.6 (2,100) |
| Overall | 80/100 | 82/100+3% |
| Lens | ||
| Lens tech | 100% HiPER | Carl Zeiss Clarity |
| Category | Cat 3 | Cat 3 |
| Anti-fog | Geventileerd ontwerp | Ja |
| Spare lens | Meegeleverd | — |
| UV protection | — | 100% |
| Fit | ||
| Weight | 29 g+14% | 33 g |
| Frame | Grilamid TR-90 | Grilamid TR-90 (semi-frameless) |
| Interchangeable lenses | — | Ja |
Pros and cons
100% Speedcraft
Pros
- HiPER lens — excellent contrast and high clarity
- Vent slots prevent fogging under helmet
- Fits cleanly under most road helmets
- Spare lens included (clear or low-light)
Cons
- Slightly less iconic than the Oakley Sutro
- Frame can slip in heavy sweat
POC Aspire
Pros
- Zeiss Clarity lens — class-leading optical clarity
- Effective anti-fog on Cauberg-style climbs
- Wide field of view from minimal frame
- Pairs cleanly with the POC Ventral helmet
Cons
- Frameless design — lens scratches faster if not stored carefully
- Too narrow for prescription riders with strong corrections