100% Speedcraft vs Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0
Comparison 2026 — Cycling Glasses
VS
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the 100% Speedcraft edges out the Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0 with an overall score of 80/100 against 75/100. It scores particularly well on protection (86/100) and comfort (86/100), making it the better all-round pick in Cycling Glasses.
The Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0 remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €60.00 versus €130.00.
Protection winner
100% Speedcraft
6% higher than its rival
Value winner
Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0
2% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | 100% Speedcraft | Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €130.00 | €60.00+117% |
| Rating | ★4.5 (1,700) | ★4.4 (1,100) |
| Overall | 80/100+7% | 75/100 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens tech | 100% HiPER | Photochromic |
| Category | Cat 3+200% | Cat 1-3 (auto) |
| Anti-fog | Geventileerd ontwerp | — |
| Spare lens | Meegeleverd | — |
| Transition time | — | ~30 s |
| UV protection | — | 100% |
| Fit | ||
| Weight | 29 g+7% | 31 g |
| Frame | Grilamid TR-90 | Sport-design |
Pros and cons
100% Speedcraft
Pros
- HiPER lens — excellent contrast and high clarity
- Vent slots prevent fogging under helmet
- Fits cleanly under most road helmets
- Spare lens included (clear or low-light)
Cons
- Slightly less iconic than the Oakley Sutro
- Frame can slip in heavy sweat
Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0
Pros
- Photochromic lens auto-adjusts
- One pair of glasses for all weather
- German Uvex brand with strong eyewear heritage
- Fits comfortably under road helmets
Cons
- Light-to-dark transition takes ~30 seconds
- Not ideal as only pair for strong summer sun on water