ABUS Hyban 2.0 vs Closca Loop
Comparison 2026 — Bike Helmets
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the ABUS Hyban 2.0 edges out the Closca Loop with an overall score of 80/100 against 65/100. It scores particularly well on protection (78/100) and comfort (78/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Helmets.
The Closca Loop remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €69.95 versus €65.00.
Protection winner
ABUS Hyban 2.0
16% higher than its rival
Value winner
ABUS Hyban 2.0
12% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | ABUS Hyban 2.0 | Closca Loop |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €65.00+8% | €69.95 |
| Rating | ★4.4 (1,850) | ★4.3 (410) |
| Overall | 80/100+23% | 65/100 |
| Protection | ||
| Certification | CE EN 1078 | CE EN 1078 |
| Type | Urban pendelaars-helm | — |
| MIPS | — | Nee |
| Fit | ||
| Sizes | M (52-58), L (56-61), XL (58-63) cm | S (53-55), M (55-57), L (57-59) cm+2% |
| Fit | Zoom verstelbaar | — |
| Weight | 380 g (M) | 350 g (M)+9% |
| Extras | ||
| Rear light | Geïntegreerd LED (3 standen) | — |
| Visor | Afneembaar | — |
| Ventilation | 8 openingen+100% | 4 openingen |
| Foldable | — | Ja — plat tot circa 33% |
Pros and cons
ABUS Hyban 2.0
Pros
- Integrated LED rear light with three modes for dark winter rides
- Removable visor shields against rain and oncoming headlights
- Solid in-mold construction with a hard outer shell
- Friendly sub-70-euro price for a lighted helmet
Cons
- On the heavy side at 380 g for the price bracket
- No MIPS or other rotational-impact liner
Closca Loop
Pros
- Folds flat to roughly a third of its volume
- Fits in a backpack, NS locker or office drawer without fuss
- CE EN 1078 certified despite the folding design
- Understated look that doesn't scream 'sports helmet' in office wear
Cons
- Less ventilation than a fixed-shell helmet
- No MIPS or integrated rear light