Fietsvergelijk

ABUS Hyban 2.0 vs MET Allroad

Comparison 2026Bike Helmets

80

ABUS Hyban 2.0

ABUS · Urban pendelaars-helm

65.00

VS
76

MET Allroad

MET · Gravel/trekking-helm

84.95

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the ABUS Hyban 2.0 edges out the MET Allroad with an overall score of 80/100 against 76/100. It scores particularly well on protection (78/100) and comfort (78/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Helmets.

The MET Allroad remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €84.95 versus €65.00.

Protection winner

MET Allroad

4% higher than its rival

Value winner

ABUS Hyban 2.0

6% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationABUS Hyban 2.0MET Allroad
Price€65.00+31%€84.95
Rating★4.4 (1,850)★4.5 (540)
Overall80/100+5%76/100
Protection
CertificationCE EN 1078CE EN 1078
TypeUrban pendelaars-helm
MIPSJa
Fit
SizesM (52-58), L (56-61), XL (58-63) cmS (52-56), M (56-58), L (58-61) cm
FitZoom verstelbaar
Weight380 g (M)300 g (M)+27%
Extras
Rear lightGeïntegreerd LED (3 standen)
VisorAfneembaarAfneembaar
Ventilation8 openingen18 openingen+125%
Goggle strapGeïntegreerd aan achterkant

Pros and cons

ABUS Hyban 2.0

Pros

  • Integrated LED rear light with three modes for dark winter rides
  • Removable visor shields against rain and oncoming headlights
  • Solid in-mold construction with a hard outer shell
  • Friendly sub-70-euro price for a lighted helmet

Cons

  • On the heavy side at 380 g for the price bracket
  • No MIPS or other rotational-impact liner

MET Allroad

Pros

  • MIPS liner for rotational-impact protection in oblique crashes
  • Removable visor shields low sun and branches
  • Rear designed for a goggle strap when running gravel eyewear
  • Generous ventilation through 18 vents — welcome in Dutch summer

Cons

  • No integrated rear light like the ABUS Urban-I 3.0
  • Sporty shape less neutral with formal office attire

Other comparisons