Fietsvergelijk

ABUS Urban-I 3.0 vs Closca Loop

Comparison 2026Bike Helmets

84

ABUS Urban-I 3.0

ABUS · Stadshelm

79.95

VS
65

Closca Loop

Closca · Opvouwbare helm

69.95

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the ABUS Urban-I 3.0 edges out the Closca Loop with an overall score of 84/100 against 65/100. It scores particularly well on protection (82/100) and comfort (85/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Helmets.

The Closca Loop remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €69.95 versus €79.95.

Protection winner

ABUS Urban-I 3.0

20% higher than its rival

Value winner

ABUS Urban-I 3.0

12% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationABUS Urban-I 3.0Closca Loop
Price€79.95€69.95+14%
Rating★4.5 (2,340)★4.3 (410)
Overall84/100+29%65/100
Protection
CertificationCE EN 1078CE EN 1078
TypeStadshelm
MIPSNee
Fit
SizesS (51-55), M (52-58), L (56-61) cmS (53-55), M (55-57), L (57-59) cm+4%
FitZoom Ace verstelbaar
Weight280 g (M)+25%350 g (M)
Extras
Rear lightGeïntegreerd LED
Ventilation12 openingen+200%4 openingen
FoldableJa — plat tot circa 33%

Pros and cons

ABUS Urban-I 3.0

Pros

  • Integrated LED rear light with three modes for visibility
  • Zoom Ace adjustable fit system dials in a perfect fit
  • Decent ventilation via 12 intakes despite the closed shell
  • Insect mesh keeps bugs from getting trapped inside

Cons

  • Runs a bit warm in high summer because of the closed top
  • Rear light uses a replaceable (non-rechargeable) battery

Closca Loop

Pros

  • Folds flat to roughly a third of its volume
  • Fits in a backpack, NS locker or office drawer without fuss
  • CE EN 1078 certified despite the folding design
  • Understated look that doesn't scream 'sports helmet' in office wear

Cons

  • Less ventilation than a fixed-shell helmet
  • No MIPS or integrated rear light

Other comparisons