ABUS Urban-I 3.0 vs MET Allroad
Comparison 2026 — Bike Helmets
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the ABUS Urban-I 3.0 edges out the MET Allroad with an overall score of 84/100 against 76/100. It scores particularly well on protection (82/100) and comfort (85/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Helmets.
The MET Allroad remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €84.95 versus €79.95.
Value winner
ABUS Urban-I 3.0
6% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | ABUS Urban-I 3.0 | MET Allroad |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €79.95+6% | €84.95 |
| Rating | ★4.5 (2,340) | ★4.5 (540) |
| Overall | 84/100+11% | 76/100 |
| Protection | ||
| Certification | CE EN 1078 | CE EN 1078 |
| Type | Stadshelm | — |
| MIPS | — | Ja |
| Fit | ||
| Sizes | S (51-55), M (52-58), L (56-61) cm | S (52-56), M (56-58), L (58-61) cm+2% |
| Fit | Zoom Ace verstelbaar | — |
| Weight | 280 g (M)+7% | 300 g (M) |
| Extras | ||
| Rear light | Geïntegreerd LED | — |
| Ventilation | 12 openingen | 18 openingen+50% |
| Visor | — | Afneembaar |
| Goggle strap | — | Geïntegreerd aan achterkant |
Pros and cons
ABUS Urban-I 3.0
Pros
- Integrated LED rear light with three modes for visibility
- Zoom Ace adjustable fit system dials in a perfect fit
- Decent ventilation via 12 intakes despite the closed shell
- Insect mesh keeps bugs from getting trapped inside
Cons
- Runs a bit warm in high summer because of the closed top
- Rear light uses a replaceable (non-rechargeable) battery
MET Allroad
Pros
- MIPS liner for rotational-impact protection in oblique crashes
- Removable visor shields low sun and branches
- Rear designed for a goggle strap when running gravel eyewear
- Generous ventilation through 18 vents — welcome in Dutch summer
Cons
- No integrated rear light like the ABUS Urban-I 3.0
- Sporty shape less neutral with formal office attire