Closca Loop vs ABUS Urban-I 3.0
Comparison 2026 — Bike Helmets
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the ABUS Urban-I 3.0 edges out the Closca Loop with an overall score of 84/100 against 65/100. It scores particularly well on protection (82/100) and comfort (85/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Helmets.
The Closca Loop remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €69.95 versus €79.95.
Protection winner
ABUS Urban-I 3.0
20% higher than its rival
Value winner
ABUS Urban-I 3.0
12% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | Closca Loop | ABUS Urban-I 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €69.95+14% | €79.95 |
| Rating | ★4.3 (410) | ★4.5 (2,340) |
| Overall | 65/100 | 84/100+29% |
| Protection | ||
| Certification | CE EN 1078 | CE EN 1078 |
| MIPS | Nee | — |
| Type | — | Stadshelm |
| Fit | ||
| Sizes | S (53-55), M (55-57), L (57-59) cm+4% | S (51-55), M (52-58), L (56-61) cm |
| Weight | 350 g (M) | 280 g (M)+25% |
| Fit | — | Zoom Ace verstelbaar |
| Extras | ||
| Foldable | Ja — plat tot circa 33% | — |
| Ventilation | 4 openingen | 12 openingen+200% |
| Rear light | — | Geïntegreerd LED |
Pros and cons
Closca Loop
Pros
- Folds flat to roughly a third of its volume
- Fits in a backpack, NS locker or office drawer without fuss
- CE EN 1078 certified despite the folding design
- Understated look that doesn't scream 'sports helmet' in office wear
Cons
- Less ventilation than a fixed-shell helmet
- No MIPS or integrated rear light
ABUS Urban-I 3.0
Pros
- Integrated LED rear light with three modes for visibility
- Zoom Ace adjustable fit system dials in a perfect fit
- Decent ventilation via 12 intakes despite the closed shell
- Insect mesh keeps bugs from getting trapped inside
Cons
- Runs a bit warm in high summer because of the closed top
- Rear light uses a replaceable (non-rechargeable) battery