Fietsvergelijk

Giant Trance X Advanced E+ 1 vs Scott Genius eRIDE 920

Comparison 2026E-Mountain Bikes

87

Giant Trance X Advanced E+ 1

Giant · All-mountain e-bike

5999.00

VS
85

Scott Genius eRIDE 920

Scott · Trail e-MTB met TwinLoc

4999.00

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the Giant Trance X Advanced E+ 1 edges out the Scott Genius eRIDE 920 with an overall score of 87/100 against 85/100. It scores particularly well on trail performance (92/100) and suspension & comfort (92/100), making it the better all-round pick in E-Mountain Bikes.

The Scott Genius eRIDE 920 remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €4999.00 versus €5999.00.

Trail performance winner

Giant Trance X Advanced E+ 1

2% higher than its rival

Value winner

Scott Genius eRIDE 920

3% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationGiant Trance X Advanced E+ 1Scott Genius eRIDE 920
Price€5999.00€4999.00+20%
Rating★4.6 (120)★4.5 (165)
Overall87/100+2%85/100
Drivetrain
MotorGiant SyncDrive Pro2 (85 Nm)Bosch Performance CX (85 Nm)+4150%
Battery800 Wh EnergyPak Smart+28%625 Wh PowerTube
Range80-120 km Eco+33%60-90 km
DrivetrainShimano XT 12-speedShimano XT 12-speed
Suspension & wheels
Front travelFox 36 Performance Elite, 140 mmFox 36 Float Performance, 150 mm
Rear travelFox Float X Performance, 150 mmFox Nude TR, 150 mm (TwinLoc)
Wheel size29"29"
Weight24 kg23.5 kg+2%

Pros and cons

Giant Trance X Advanced E+ 1

Pros

  • 800Wh battery — 80-120 km range in Eco mode
  • SyncDrive Pro2 (85 Nm Yamaha-based) for steep climbs
  • Carbon frame with Maestro suspension platform
  • Local Giant dealer network for service

Cons

  • At 24 kg one of the heaviest bikes in its class
  • No lightweight feel like the Trek Fuel EXe

Scott Genius eRIDE 920

Pros

  • TwinLoc 3-mode suspension from the bar
  • Bosch Performance CX (85 Nm) with 625Wh battery
  • 150mm travel — more than Cube for aggressive riding
  • Alpine engineering from Swiss Scott

Cons

  • 625Wh battery less than Giant 800Wh
  • TwinLoc adds complexity — not every rider uses it

Other comparisons