Oakley Sutro vs POC Aspire
Comparison 2026 — Cycling Glasses
VS
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Oakley Sutro edges out the POC Aspire with an overall score of 86/100 against 82/100. It scores particularly well on protection (92/100) and comfort (88/100), making it the better all-round pick in Cycling Glasses.
The POC Aspire remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €120.00 versus €155.00.
Protection winner
Oakley Sutro
4% higher than its rival
Value winner
POC Aspire
6% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | Oakley Sutro | POC Aspire |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €155.00 | €120.00+29% |
| Rating | ★4.7 (3,800) | ★4.6 (2,100) |
| Overall | 86/100+5% | 82/100 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens tech | Oakley Prizm Road | Carl Zeiss Clarity |
| Category | Cat 3 (zon) | Cat 3 |
| UV protection | 100% UVA/UVB/UVC | 100% |
| Anti-fog | Ja | Ja |
| Fit | ||
| Weight | 30 g+10% | 33 g |
| Frame | O Matter (Oakley nylon) | Grilamid TR-90 (semi-frameless) |
| Interchangeable lenses | Ja, los verkrijgbaar | Ja |
Pros and cons
Oakley Sutro
Pros
- Prizm Road lens boosts asphalt contrast
- Oversized coverage against wind, rain, bugs
- Comfortable fit under nearly any helmet
- Iconic design — recognisable in every peloton
Cons
- €155 — premium price point
- Prizm Road not ideal for MTB forest light
POC Aspire
Pros
- Zeiss Clarity lens — class-leading optical clarity
- Effective anti-fog on Cauberg-style climbs
- Wide field of view from minimal frame
- Pairs cleanly with the POC Ventral helmet
Cons
- Frameless design — lens scratches faster if not stored carefully
- Too narrow for prescription riders with strong corrections