POC Aspire vs Oakley Sutro
Comparison 2026 — Cycling Glasses
VS
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Oakley Sutro edges out the POC Aspire with an overall score of 86/100 against 82/100. It scores particularly well on protection (92/100) and comfort (88/100), making it the better all-round pick in Cycling Glasses.
The POC Aspire remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €120.00 versus €155.00.
Protection winner
Oakley Sutro
4% higher than its rival
Value winner
POC Aspire
6% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | POC Aspire | Oakley Sutro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €120.00+29% | €155.00 |
| Rating | ★4.6 (2,100) | ★4.7 (3,800) |
| Overall | 82/100 | 86/100+5% |
| Lens | ||
| Lens tech | Carl Zeiss Clarity | Oakley Prizm Road |
| Category | Cat 3 | Cat 3 (zon) |
| Anti-fog | Ja | Ja |
| UV protection | 100% | 100% UVA/UVB/UVC |
| Fit | ||
| Weight | 33 g | 30 g+10% |
| Frame | Grilamid TR-90 (semi-frameless) | O Matter (Oakley nylon) |
| Interchangeable lenses | Ja | Ja, los verkrijgbaar |
Pros and cons
POC Aspire
Pros
- Zeiss Clarity lens — class-leading optical clarity
- Effective anti-fog on Cauberg-style climbs
- Wide field of view from minimal frame
- Pairs cleanly with the POC Ventral helmet
Cons
- Frameless design — lens scratches faster if not stored carefully
- Too narrow for prescription riders with strong corrections
Oakley Sutro
Pros
- Prizm Road lens boosts asphalt contrast
- Oversized coverage against wind, rain, bugs
- Comfortable fit under nearly any helmet
- Iconic design — recognisable in every peloton
Cons
- €155 — premium price point
- Prizm Road not ideal for MTB forest light