Sigma Aura 80 USB vs Sigma Buster 1100
Comparison 2026 — Bike Lights
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Sigma Aura 80 USB edges out the Sigma Buster 1100 with an overall score of 78/100 against 78/100. It scores particularly well on brightness (76/100) and battery life (74/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Lights.
The Sigma Buster 1100 remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €74.95 versus €34.95.
Brightness winner
Sigma Buster 1100
20% higher than its rival
Value winner
Sigma Aura 80 USB
18% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | Sigma Aura 80 USB | Sigma Buster 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €34.95+114% | €74.95 |
| Rating | ★4.4 (1,560) | ★4.5 (1,210) |
| Overall | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Lighting | ||
| Brightness | 80 lux | 1100 lumen+1275% |
| Certification | StVZO, CE | CE (geen StVZO) |
| Modes | — | 5 |
| Battery | ||
| Type | USB Li-ion | USB-C Li-ion, snellaad |
| Runtime | 4 u (hoog) / 15 u (eco)+167% | 1,5 u (1100 lm) / 3,5 u (500 lm) |
| Charge time | — | 2,5 u |
| Properties | ||
| Weight | 73 g+103% | 148 g |
| Waterproof rating | IPX4 | IPX5+25% |
| Mount | Siliconen snelkoppeling | Stuur + helm meegeleverd |
Pros and cons
Sigma Aura 80 USB
Pros
- 80 lux output — more than enough for unlit cycle paths
- StVZO approved: no dazzling of oncoming traffic
- USB rechargeable with up to 15 hours runtime in eco mode
- Quick-release mount for easy removal to prevent theft
Cons
- Micro-USB instead of USB-C (outdated connector)
- No daytime running light mode available
Sigma Buster 1100
Pros
- 1100 lumens — enough to light pitch-black forest 50 metres ahead
- Helmet mount AND bar mount included
- USB-C fast-charge (2.5 hours empty-to-full)
- Aluminium heatsink prevents throttling on long rides
Cons
- No StVZO approval — legally dubious in the Netherlands as sole front light
- Just 1.5 hours runtime on full power