Sigma Buster 1100 vs Trelock LS 660 I-GO Vision
Comparison 2026 — Bike Lights
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Trelock LS 660 I-GO Vision edges out the Sigma Buster 1100 with an overall score of 82/100 against 78/100. It scores particularly well on brightness (86/100) and battery life (84/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Lights.
The Sigma Buster 1100 remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €74.95 versus €49.95.
Brightness winner
Sigma Buster 1100
10% higher than its rival
Value winner
Trelock LS 660 I-GO Vision
2% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | Sigma Buster 1100 | Trelock LS 660 I-GO Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €74.95 | €49.95+50% |
| Rating | ★4.5 (1,210) | ★4.3 (680) |
| Overall | 78/100 | 82/100+5% |
| Lighting | ||
| Brightness | 1100 lumen+1000% | 100 lux |
| Certification | CE (geen StVZO) | StVZO, CE |
| Modes | 5 | — |
| Battery | ||
| Type | USB-C Li-ion, snellaad | USB-C Li-ion |
| Runtime | 1,5 u (1100 lm) / 3,5 u (500 lm) | 5 u / 20 u+233% |
| Charge time | 2,5 u | — |
| Properties | ||
| Weight | 148 g | 95 g+56% |
| Waterproof rating | IPX5 | IPX5 |
| Mount | Stuur + helm meegeleverd | — |
Pros and cons
Sigma Buster 1100
Pros
- 1100 lumens — enough to light pitch-black forest 50 metres ahead
- Helmet mount AND bar mount included
- USB-C fast-charge (2.5 hours empty-to-full)
- Aluminium heatsink prevents throttling on long rides
Cons
- No StVZO approval — legally dubious in the Netherlands as sole front light
- Just 1.5 hours runtime on full power
Trelock LS 660 I-GO Vision
Pros
- 100 lux with a uniform beam thanks to a custom lens design
- USB-C charging port — future-proof and fast charging
- Automatic light sensor adapts brightness to surroundings
- Made in Germany build quality and 3-year warranty
Cons
- Mounting bracket can rattle slightly on vibrations
- Higher price point than comparable Sigma lights