Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0 vs Oakley Sutro
Comparison 2026 — Cycling Glasses
VS
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Oakley Sutro edges out the Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0 with an overall score of 86/100 against 75/100. It scores particularly well on protection (92/100) and comfort (88/100), making it the better all-round pick in Cycling Glasses.
The Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0 remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €60.00 versus €155.00.
Protection winner
Oakley Sutro
12% higher than its rival
Value winner
Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0
12% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0 | Oakley Sutro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €60.00+158% | €155.00 |
| Rating | ★4.4 (1,100) | ★4.7 (3,800) |
| Overall | 75/100 | 86/100+15% |
| Lens | ||
| Lens tech | Photochromic | Oakley Prizm Road |
| Category | Cat 1-3 (auto) | Cat 3 (zon)+200% |
| Transition time | ~30 s | — |
| UV protection | 100% | 100% UVA/UVB/UVC |
| Anti-fog | — | Ja |
| Fit | ||
| Weight | 31 g | 30 g+3% |
| Frame | Sport-design | O Matter (Oakley nylon) |
| Interchangeable lenses | — | Ja, los verkrijgbaar |
Pros and cons
Uvex Sportstyle 231 2.0
Pros
- Photochromic lens auto-adjusts
- One pair of glasses for all weather
- German Uvex brand with strong eyewear heritage
- Fits comfortably under road helmets
Cons
- Light-to-dark transition takes ~30 seconds
- Not ideal as only pair for strong summer sun on water
Oakley Sutro
Pros
- Prizm Road lens boosts asphalt contrast
- Oversized coverage against wind, rain, bugs
- Comfortable fit under nearly any helmet
- Iconic design — recognisable in every peloton
Cons
- €155 — premium price point
- Prizm Road not ideal for MTB forest light