MET Allroad vs Casco Roadster
Comparison 2026 — Bike Helmets
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the Casco Roadster edges out the MET Allroad with an overall score of 84/100 against 76/100. It scores particularly well on protection (94/100) and comfort (82/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Helmets.
The MET Allroad remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €84.95 versus €129.95.
Protection winner
Casco Roadster
12% higher than its rival
Value winner
MET Allroad
4% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | MET Allroad | Casco Roadster |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €84.95+53% | €129.95 |
| Rating | ★4.5 (540) | ★4.7 (890) |
| Overall | 76/100 | 84/100+11% |
| Protection | ||
| Certification | CE EN 1078 | NTA 8776, CE EN 1078+714% |
| MIPS | Ja | — |
| Type | — | Speed pedelec-helm |
| Fit | ||
| Sizes | S (52-56), M (56-58), L (58-61) cm | S (52-56), M (56-58), L (58-61) cm |
| Weight | 300 g (M)+53% | 460 g (M) |
| Extras | ||
| Visor | Afneembaar | Afneembaar |
| Goggle strap | Geïntegreerd aan achterkant | — |
| Ventilation | 18 openingen | Actieve luchtkanalen |
Pros and cons
MET Allroad
Pros
- MIPS liner for rotational-impact protection in oblique crashes
- Removable visor shields low sun and branches
- Rear designed for a goggle strap when running gravel eyewear
- Generous ventilation through 18 vents — welcome in Dutch summer
Cons
- No integrated rear light like the ABUS Urban-I 3.0
- Sporty shape less neutral with formal office attire
Casco Roadster
Pros
- NTA 8776 certified — legal for speed pedelecs in the Netherlands
- Extended coverage around temples and rear for 45 km/h impacts
- Removable visor against bugs, wind and low sun
- Pleasant fit via Casco's proprietary adjustment system
Cons
- Considerably heavier than EN 1078 helmets (460 g)
- No integrated LED rear light