Fietsvergelijk

MET Allroad vs Lumos Ultra

Comparison 2026Bike Helmets

76

MET Allroad

MET · Gravel/trekking-helm

84.95

VS
86

Lumos Ultra

Lumos · Stadshelm met verlichting

149.95

Our verdict

Based on our weighted scoring, the Lumos Ultra edges out the MET Allroad with an overall score of 86/100 against 76/100. It scores particularly well on protection (90/100) and comfort (88/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Helmets.

The MET Allroad remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €84.95 versus €149.95.

Protection winner

Lumos Ultra

8% higher than its rival

Value winner

MET Allroad

12% better value for money

Specifications

SpecificationMET AllroadLumos Ultra
Price€84.95+77%€149.95
Rating★4.5 (540)★4.3 (780)
Overall76/10086/100+13%
Protection
CertificationCE EN 1078CE EN 1078, CPSC
MIPSJaJa
Fit
SizesS (52-56), M (56-58), L (58-61) cmM (54-58), L (58-62) cm+4%
Weight300 g (M)+28%385 g (M)
Extras
VisorAfneembaar
Goggle strapGeïntegreerd aan achterkant
Ventilation18 openingen
Lighting
Type360° LED, wit voor + rood achter
Brake lightJa, automatisch
BatteryUSB-C, 6 uur
ConnectivityBluetooth, Garmin

Pros and cons

MET Allroad

Pros

  • MIPS liner for rotational-impact protection in oblique crashes
  • Removable visor shields low sun and branches
  • Rear designed for a goggle strap when running gravel eyewear
  • Generous ventilation through 18 vents — welcome in Dutch summer

Cons

  • No integrated rear light like the ABUS Urban-I 3.0
  • Sporty shape less neutral with formal office attire

Lumos Ultra

Pros

  • MIPS liner adds rotation-impact protection in oblique crashes
  • 360-degree integrated LEDs with automatic brake light
  • USB-C rechargeable — up to 6 hours of runtime per charge
  • Pairs with Apple Watch and Garmin for turn-signal control

Cons

  • Significant price premium over standard helmets
  • Heavier than lightless alternatives at 385 g

Other comparisons