MET Allroad vs ABUS Urban-I 3.0
Comparison 2026 — Bike Helmets
Our verdict
Based on our weighted scoring, the ABUS Urban-I 3.0 edges out the MET Allroad with an overall score of 84/100 against 76/100. It scores particularly well on protection (82/100) and comfort (85/100), making it the better all-round pick in Bike Helmets.
The MET Allroad remains a sensible alternative if price is your main concern — it lands at €84.95 versus €79.95.
Value winner
ABUS Urban-I 3.0
6% better value for money
Specifications
| Specification | MET Allroad | ABUS Urban-I 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €84.95 | €79.95+6% |
| Rating | ★4.5 (540) | ★4.5 (2,340) |
| Overall | 76/100 | 84/100+11% |
| Protection | ||
| Certification | CE EN 1078 | CE EN 1078 |
| MIPS | Ja | — |
| Type | — | Stadshelm |
| Fit | ||
| Sizes | S (52-56), M (56-58), L (58-61) cm+2% | S (51-55), M (52-58), L (56-61) cm |
| Weight | 300 g (M) | 280 g (M)+7% |
| Fit | — | Zoom Ace verstelbaar |
| Extras | ||
| Visor | Afneembaar | — |
| Goggle strap | Geïntegreerd aan achterkant | — |
| Ventilation | 18 openingen+50% | 12 openingen |
| Rear light | — | Geïntegreerd LED |
Pros and cons
MET Allroad
Pros
- MIPS liner for rotational-impact protection in oblique crashes
- Removable visor shields low sun and branches
- Rear designed for a goggle strap when running gravel eyewear
- Generous ventilation through 18 vents — welcome in Dutch summer
Cons
- No integrated rear light like the ABUS Urban-I 3.0
- Sporty shape less neutral with formal office attire
ABUS Urban-I 3.0
Pros
- Integrated LED rear light with three modes for visibility
- Zoom Ace adjustable fit system dials in a perfect fit
- Decent ventilation via 12 intakes despite the closed shell
- Insect mesh keeps bugs from getting trapped inside
Cons
- Runs a bit warm in high summer because of the closed top
- Rear light uses a replaceable (non-rechargeable) battery