MET Allroad vs Closca Loop
Comparison 2026 — Bike Helmets
Our verdict
The MET Allroad wins 85 to 74, but the two helmets solve completely different problems. The Allroad is a gravel/allroad helmet for sport riders on long rides; the Closca Loop is a folding helmet for public-transport users and bike-share riders who need to stow it. The MET Allroad has CE EN 1078 certification, 19 vents, an integrated visor against sun and branches, an adjustable Safe-T Orbital retention system, and weighs 320 g at €89.95. The Closca Loop uses a patent-pending folding mechanism that shrinks it by 50%, weighs 350 g, meets EN 1078 and costs €89.95 — same price, totally different philosophy. On protection the MET scores 86 vs 78, on ventilation 92 vs 70 (critical for sport riding), and on portability the Closca wins 95 vs 60. The Closca folds into a handbag or rucksack pocket; the MET has to clip to bag or bars.
For Dutch NS riders grabbing an OV-fiets and carrying the helmet onward on the train, the Closca Loop is genuinely inventive. For gravel riders touring the Utrechtse Heuvelrug or Veluwe over 60+ km, the MET is a far better helmet in every way — more ventilation, better retention, UV visor.
For sport-leaning recreational riders we recommend the MET Allroad. The Closca Loop solves a real problem smartly, but only matters if foldability outweighs ventilation and retention for you.
MET Allroad
The MET Allroad wins with 19 vents, an integrated sun visor and the superior Safe-T Orbital retention system — exactly what sporty gravel riders in the Heuvelrug need.
MET Allroad
The Closca Loop folds 50% smaller and fits in a handbag — perfect for OV-fiets users and travellers who need to carry a helmet onto the train.
Specifications
| Specification | MET Allroad | Closca Loop |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €84.95 | €69.95+21% |
| Rating | ★4.5 (540) | ★4.3 (410) |
| Overall | 76/100+17% | 65/100 |
| Protection | ||
| Certification | CE EN 1078 | CE EN 1078 |
| MIPS | Ja | Nee |
| Fit | ||
| Sizes | S (52-56), M (56-58), L (58-61) cm | S (53-55), M (55-57), L (57-59) cm+2% |
| Weight | 300 g (M)+17% | 350 g (M) |
| Extras | ||
| Visor | Afneembaar | — |
| Goggle strap | Geïntegreerd aan achterkant | — |
| Ventilation | 18 openingen+350% | 4 openingen |
| Foldable | — | Ja — plat tot circa 33% |
Pros and cons
MET Allroad
Pros
- MIPS liner for rotational-impact protection in oblique crashes
- Removable visor shields low sun and branches
- Rear designed for a goggle strap when running gravel eyewear
- Generous ventilation through 18 vents — welcome in Dutch summer
Cons
- No integrated rear light like the ABUS Urban-I 3.0
- Sporty shape less neutral with formal office attire
Closca Loop
Pros
- Folds flat to roughly a third of its volume
- Fits in a backpack, NS locker or office drawer without fuss
- CE EN 1078 certified despite the folding design
- Understated look that doesn't scream 'sports helmet' in office wear
Cons
- Less ventilation than a fixed-shell helmet
- No MIPS or integrated rear light